Automated LC review — now right here in the GuildUpload documents → AI discrepancy analysis → correction guide.
NEW Start LC Review →
← Lounge

There is no moral or political superiority to justify throwing stones at Cho Hee-dae

Machine translated

Look at the news comments regarding the meeting between the President and Kim Min-seok, Jung Chung-rae, and Young Gil Song.
The comments are flooded with people calling them psychopaths. Do you think members of Shincheonji wrote them?

The reason Cho Hee-dae is acting out is that he has seen through the current administration's passivity regarding ending the insurrection and implementing reforms,
and he saw an opportunity for the support base to loosen its grip.
Cho Hee-dae's precedents and procedural issues?
During the national convention, they ignored all party constitutions and regulations through an unprecedented minority vote that no one had ever heard of.
Is Cho Hee-dae an accomplice to the insurrection?
The President is the one who played golf with the pro-Yoon faction, even while the insurrectionist party was being called for dissolution.
Is Cho Hee-dae not allowed to appoint his own people?
The Chief Justice wants to appoint his own justices, yet the President just appoints party leaders at will.
Is it unconstitutional for Cho Hee-dae to remand a case without reviewing the documents?
The President boasted on broadcast that he signed bills without even looking at them.
If an impeachment motion is filed against Cho Hee-dae and a Constitutional Court trial is held, conservative groups will gather once again.
Do you think the Democratic camp will gather? They will say, "Yeah, do whatever you want. This is going to be good entertainment."
They say they aren't helpful to the cause because they are just a handful of "Shincheonji" followers.
Candlelight Action? After Kim Min-seok's brother jumped into the national convention in such a disgraceful manner, they have lost all representativeness.

Comments 0

No comments yet
0